Last week I posted the two shots below and asked, “Which Shot Is Better”?
Shot A:
Shot B:
Normally, responses to questions like this are pretty one-sided but this time they were evenly split in support of both crops. Here are some comments in support of Shot A:
“I like A with the whole rock. I thought the background was beautiful. It gave a look at the surroundings of the duck and motion”.
“My preference is A, because it puts him in context”.
“I like A better but I would edit the blade of grass out”.
In Support of Shot B:
“I like B better and it’s because it doesn’t have the blade of grass in front of the rock which I find distracting. If that blade of grass hadn’t been there, I would have suggested cropping less of the bottom of the frame in shot B so that we could see the rock face. However, since it is there, shot B is the best shot as is”.
“My personal preference is the tighter crop [Shot B], but I would position the bird slightly to the right”.
“I like B because I can see the bird better, but it is cool to see the rock in A”.
Crop A was preferred by those who like to see the bird as part of the habitat (although the blades of grass are evidently too much habitat). Crop B focuses the viewer’s attention on the Mallard. If these shots were entered in a bird photography contest Shot A would have been rated higher because it does show the bird’s surroundings more. Keep that in mind when cropping your shots – are you trying to please yourself or an audience? The end result might require a different view.
If you enjoy seeing beautiful pictures of birds from around the world and reading about them Click Here to sign up for our mailing list. Members can post their own GreatBirdPics and learn more about bird photography techniques.
I like the first one, more context. I’m probably wrong though!
A by far